「利用者:Fujitaairintake57」の版間の差分
Fujitaairintake57 (トーク | 投稿記録) 細 |
Fujitaairintake57 (トーク | 投稿記録) 細 |
||
| 1行目: | 1行目: | ||
| − | + | They all do the very same issue. Some filter much better than some others and some dont. Some movement improved than other individuals and some dont. Some say the stock method flows much more than ample air that the engine can successfully use and almost nothing out filters it. Air intakes do not give you any gain in electrical power or performance. Most are work exactly zero h.p. above stock. Some purchase them for more turbo noise. Some have reported better mileage in which as other people have reported worse mileage.<br><br>I have the AEM on my Jeep but I did not do it for energy or fuel milage or noise....I necessary to absolutely free up some area below my hood and that was about the only way I could get it accomplished. It does have a dam to separate underhood airflow but I am not fully confident it seals all that properly and there is in all probability a bit of underhood heat entering the intake. I also installed the TB spacer and it doesn't make any noise so thats a non-concern.<br><br>On the aesthetic side of issues, the Aircharger system seems to be like a pretty substantial good quality OEM stock element underneath the hood (with the exception of the polished filter cap), and looks like it belongs there. Also, when we took the automobile to broad-open-throttle on our dyno runs there was a quite obvious variation in the sound of the intake, and a very slight change in the exhaust note of the SS. Over all, the automobile just sounded much more aggressive.<br><br>From a design, engineering and construction viewpoint you can readily see that there without a doubt is a significant variation in Cold Air Intakes in their engineering. These variations can and will have a dramatic have an impact on on your automobiles effectiveness. The AEM consumption must be capable to scoop some really serious air when the car is in movement, just be certain to watch out for puddles of water for clear reasons. In the instructions AEM recommends that you will not drive with this consumption in inclement climate.<br><br>Verify out our full story on the install of the AEM Cold Air consumption for all the specifics, but the basics are that you will will need to jack up the vehicle and get rid of the driver's side front wheel, get loose the fender very well liner, remove the stock windshield washer bottle, snake the AEM tubing down into the fender, and mount the new washer bottle that AEM incorporates underneath the hood. That is surely an more than simplification of the install approach, but just know that it is not all that lousy, it just requires far more time than most other intakes. | |
2016年7月23日 (土) 21:49時点における版
They all do the very same issue. Some filter much better than some others and some dont. Some movement improved than other individuals and some dont. Some say the stock method flows much more than ample air that the engine can successfully use and almost nothing out filters it. Air intakes do not give you any gain in electrical power or performance. Most are work exactly zero h.p. above stock. Some purchase them for more turbo noise. Some have reported better mileage in which as other people have reported worse mileage.
I have the AEM on my Jeep but I did not do it for energy or fuel milage or noise....I necessary to absolutely free up some area below my hood and that was about the only way I could get it accomplished. It does have a dam to separate underhood airflow but I am not fully confident it seals all that properly and there is in all probability a bit of underhood heat entering the intake. I also installed the TB spacer and it doesn't make any noise so thats a non-concern.
On the aesthetic side of issues, the Aircharger system seems to be like a pretty substantial good quality OEM stock element underneath the hood (with the exception of the polished filter cap), and looks like it belongs there. Also, when we took the automobile to broad-open-throttle on our dyno runs there was a quite obvious variation in the sound of the intake, and a very slight change in the exhaust note of the SS. Over all, the automobile just sounded much more aggressive.
From a design, engineering and construction viewpoint you can readily see that there without a doubt is a significant variation in Cold Air Intakes in their engineering. These variations can and will have a dramatic have an impact on on your automobiles effectiveness. The AEM consumption must be capable to scoop some really serious air when the car is in movement, just be certain to watch out for puddles of water for clear reasons. In the instructions AEM recommends that you will not drive with this consumption in inclement climate.
Verify out our full story on the install of the AEM Cold Air consumption for all the specifics, but the basics are that you will will need to jack up the vehicle and get rid of the driver's side front wheel, get loose the fender very well liner, remove the stock windshield washer bottle, snake the AEM tubing down into the fender, and mount the new washer bottle that AEM incorporates underneath the hood. That is surely an more than simplification of the install approach, but just know that it is not all that lousy, it just requires far more time than most other intakes.
